#615

Date:    Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:47:14 -0500

From:    Karl Larson <klarson3@GUSTAVUS.EDU>

Subject: health care systems

Hi all. Anyone out in HEDIR-land created a nice little summary of the pro's and con's of the main types of health care systems? I am thinking there are probably 4 (?): National, universal, social security, and free market.

 

If you have something, or know of a resource to access, I'd appreciate it.

 

Thanks

 

K

Karl Larson, PhD

Assistant Professor of Health Education

800 W. College, Lund 212G

Gustavus Adolphus College

St. Peter, MN 56082

507-933-7591

klarson3@gustavus.edu

-------

#616

Date:    Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:38:53 -0700

From:    Mark Fulop <markfulop@YAHOO.COM>

Subject: Re: health care systems

>>>Hi all. Anyone out in HEDIR-land created a nice little summary of the pro's and con's of the main types of health care systems? I am thinking there are probably 4 (?): National, universal, social security, and free market.

 

 

Nope.  However a simple google search shows a bunch of international comparisons which could get at public verses private models. 

 

NPR: http://www.npr.org/news/specials/healthcare/healthcare_profiles.html

 

Commonwealth Fund http://www.commonwealthfund.org/topics/topics_list.htm?attrib_id=15311 

 

Also see: http://www.pnrec.org/2001papers/DaigneaultLajoie.pdf

 


 

m

 

===

 

Mark Fulop, MA, MPH

Portland, OR

Do your part: Join Zipcar & get $25

------

#617

Date:    Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:39:35 -0500

From:    Mark Kittleson <kittle@SIU.EDU>

Subject: Re: health care systems

If I’m not mistaken, PBS did something with comparing various industrial countries’ health care system this past year.  I searched the web site but couldn’t find it..(I thought it was available on-line).  Perhaps somebody else has that information.

 

 

Mark

 

Mark J. Kittleson, PhD, FAAHB

Professor & Graduate Director, Health Education

Southern Illinois University

www.kittle.siu.edu

www.hedir.org

Phone:  618-453-1841

FAX:  618-453-1829

Skype:  mark.j.kittleson

Graduate Programs Website:  www.siu-salukis-hed.com

 

--------

#618

Date:    Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:30:44 -0500

From:    Mark Kittleson <kittle@SIU.EDU>

Subject: FW: health care systems

 

** Submit to the HEDIR Technology Seminar
** www.hedir.org/technology
** Presented During AAHE--Spring, 2009
**
** Take the HEDIR Technology Survey
** http://www.hedir.org/survey
** Thanks.

Craig Becker has identified the video I referred to earlier.  Thanks Craig.  And you can watch it online.

 

 

Mark

 

Mark J. Kittleson, PhD, FAAHB

Professor & Graduate Director, Health Education

Southern Illinois University

www.kittle.siu.edu

www.hedir.org

Phone:  618-453-1841

FAX:  618-453-1829

Skype:  mark.j.kittleson

Graduate Programs Website:  www.siu-salukis-hed.com

 

From: Craig Becker Ph.D. [mailto:beckerc@ecu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 12:19 PM
To: Mark Kittleson
Subject: Re: health care systems

 

I believe this is it: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld/. I hope this helps.

--

Be Wellr,

Craig M. Becker, Ph.D.

Department of Health Education & Promotion

East Carolina University

3207 Carol Belk Building

Greenville, NC 27858

Telephone: 252-328-5312

beckerc@ecu.edu

---------

#619

Date:    Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:53:57 -0500

From:    James Teufel <teufel@SIU.EDU>

Subject: Re: health care systems

A scholarly work that I have browsed through in the past that helps to set a framework for thinking about global health care is:

Global Health Care Markets: A Comprehensive Guide to Regions, Trends, and Opportunities Shaping the International Health Arena by Walter Wieners.

The book was published in 2001so it is a bit dated.  However, the general concepts are still applicable (the more things change, the more they stay the same). 

The advantaged of its outdated-ness is that it could be purchased at a low cost.  Although regions have changed some and opportunities are arguable (as is obligatory in discussions of health care), the trends are still pertinent in general. 

 

Michael Moore’s Sicko is also an important popular work.  It is seemingly his most valid and descriptive case that he has made regarding a social issue to date.  His logical argument versus emotional appeal is the highest in this film.

I hope this helps.

James

 

 

Director of Research and Evaluation

Center for Rural Health and Social Service Development

Southern Illinois University Carbondale

-------

#620

Date:    Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:36:31 -0700

From:    Mark Fulop <markfulop@YAHOO.COM>

Subject: Quick need of an Article

Hi all,

 

I am in need of the following article:

 

Health education and community empowerment: conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational, and community control. Israel BA, Checkoway B, Schulz A, Zimmerman M. Health Educ Q. 1994 Summer;21(2):149-70. 

I will ensure we get a legal copy of the article for our files but to shorten the time process for our more immediate need is there anyone who can send me a copy?

 

I will let the list know when I get the first copy

 

m

 

===

 

Mark Fulop, MA, MPH

Portland, OR

Do your part: Join Zipcar & get $25

 

“The teenagers and college students who left their homes to march in the streets of Birmingham and Montgomery; the mothers who walked instead of taking the bus after a long day of doing somebody else's laundry and cleaning somebody else's kitchen — they didn't brave fire hoses and Billy clubs so that their grandchildren and their great-grandchildren would still wonder at the beginning of the 21st century whether their vote would be counted; whether their civil rights would be protected by their government; whether justice would be equal and opportunity would be theirs. . . . We have more work to do.” Obama 08

 

---------

#621

Date:    Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:01:34 -0500

From:    Dean Kniss <knissdd@SFASU.EDU>

Subject: Ultrasound screening?

As health educators we encourage preventative screening tests such as blood pressure, cholesterol, etc. 

I am curious to hear some thoughts on ultrasound screening being conducted by some companies. This is presented as a screening tool that "would cost you thousands of dollars if done in a traditional hospital setting" and is being done on an outreach basis for about $20 per scan ($180 for a complete scan). They do carotids, lower extremities, kidney, heart, gall bladder, liver... not sure what else. 

This was made available to my wife's school district and I was wanting some input as to the legitimacy of such "screening tests".

D. Dean Kniss, PhD, CHES

Assistant Professor

Kinesiology and Health Science

Stephen F. Austin State University

PO Box 13015 - SFA Station

Nacogdoches, TX 75962

(936) 468-1817

knissdd@sfasu.edu

 



 

--------

#622

Date:    Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:14:24 -0500

From:    James Teufel <teufel@SIU.EDU>

Subject: Re: Ultrasound screening?

Do you know who was conducting the screenings? Mobile health care units have become more popular in the last ten years, especially when dealing with underserved populations.  Bringing services to the people is a theoretically viable idea, though financing can sometimes be a problem.  If the screenings were conducted by those with appropriate licensure, certification, and affiliation, there is likely no problem—simply an innovative outreach mechanism.  Prevention also acts as a cost control method in the long run so outreach efforts have positive social and economic benefits.  Additionally, if these screeners are affiliated with a larger health care entity, these screenings may also serve as a marketing tool (after all health care is a business in the United States).  For example, one hospital may provide this service to improve their relative advantage over another hospital and thereby increase their market share.  From the market share perspective, it makes sense to penetrate upper middle class communities instead of lower strata groups.  The reason being, from the market share perspective, the health care organization would want to recruit privately insured patients, which would result in improving their payer mix. 

The validity of this method in large part depends on the qualifications of the staff/organization and the quality of their equipment.  There are of course epidemiological issues that can result from testing low risk versus high risk groups for high or low prevalence health problems—a potential ethics issue.

My quick thoughts.
James

 

Director of Research and Evaluation

Center for Rural Health and Social Service Development

Southern Illinois University Carbondale

------

#623

Date:    Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:06:21 -0700

From:    Mark Fulop <markfulop@YAHOO.COM>

Subject: Got the Article!

Thanks Jim and for all else, Sorry to bombard your email boxes. 
 

m

 

===

 

Mark Fulop, MA, MPH

Portland, OR

Do your part: Join Zipcar & get $25